Category Archives: Study in the US

Fifteen-to-Finish campaign wins fans, stokes worries

Hashtag unites adjuncts and tenure-line professors over work-life balance and other issues

Grad students should think like entrepreneurs about their careers (essay)

Facing radically unstable futures, graduate students are an especially vulnerable population within the neoliberal academy. A diminished tenure-track job market is one reason that graduate students should think and behave more like entrepreneurs and less like apprentices.

In many corners of academe, this shift is already in effect. More and more Ph.D. students are finding ways to carve out varied and rewarding career paths for themselves. “Redefining the Humanist Entrepreneur,” a “Connected Academics [1]” panel at this year’s Modern Language Association convention, featured an eclectic group of Ph.D.s who’ve gone on to fascinating careers.

For example, Bradford Taylor [2] discussed his experience founding a wine shop [3] and noted that he’s found ways to put his doctoral research (which focuses on aesthetics and food from Hume to Adorno) into practice. He does this through a newsletter as well as in the day-to-day rhythms of the shop. Taylor’s career path is but one example of just how far we’ve come from the days of academic departments “placing” students.

While some MLA attendees may have shuddered to see yet another term from the business world on the convention’s program, I think “entrepreneur” is a useful way for graduate students to think about themselves. For one thing, they already have a lot of qualities that we associate with entrepreneurs. Richard Cherwitz, a professor in the rhetoric department at the University of Texas at Austin, describes intellectual entrepreneurs as those who “take risks and seize opportunities, discover and create knowledge, innovate, collaborate, and solve problems in any number of social realms.”

Graduate students need to apply to their career preparation the same entrepreneurial spirit they apply to their academic research. By thinking more like an entrepreneur (or a professional, CEO or revolutionary) and less like an apprentice, graduate students can better prepare themselves for a range of fulfilling and meaningful careers. Here are some steps you can take to do that:

Begin by evaluating your relationship with your graduate adviser. One of the most radical shifts in graduate education needs to take place at the level of the mentor-mentee relationship. Graduate students are still, by and large, treated like apprentices, working with advisers supposedly able to usher them into prescribed, defined careers. As the tenure-track job market dissolves, such a model becomes increasingly untenable. You should break free of the apprentice mind-set by moving past the outmoded single-adviser model.

Even if you have the best of advisers, she can’t help as much when it comes to alt-ac or compatible careers. And chances are she can’t place you in an academic career. Try as they might, graduate mentors can’t get up to speed quickly enough to train you for careers other than the ones for which they themselves were trained.

For the most part, graduate students have to find -- or create -- careers for themselves. Now that the majority of graduate students are headed for jobs that are nothing like those held by their adviser, it’s clear that even the most well-intentioned individual can’t give you the variety of career advice you’ll need. So you need to run your career search with the help of multiple advisers -- an informal board of directors, if you will.

Make sure such a board has a strong contingent from beyond your academic institution. Seek out career-service counselors, administrators, career coaches, corporate types and graduates who’ve gone on to alt-ac jobs. Do your best to develop multiple mentors for yourself, and keep in touch with them as best you can.

If you’re a graduate adviser, you must learn to cede authority to a plurality of advisers. Better yet, learn how to advise and mentor as a part of a team that includes members from various corners of the university, as well as those from beyond it.

Reject any discourse that figures your career using static metaphors. When trying to picture your career, you should see the Northern Lights -- not placement in a track. It’s not all or nothing. It’s not academe or bust. The idea of careers inside, outside or even beyond higher education may not make sense when you’re in the middle of your career.

At the “Connected Academics” panel at the MLA, Eric Wertheimer, associate vice provost of graduate education and professor of English at Arizona State University, noted that universities of the future will not police their boundaries “quite as piously as we do now.” So even if you do decide on a career beyond academe, don’t burn any bridges, and don’t assume your graduate training has no bearing on the work you’ll do beyond the professoriate [4].

Be aware of career choices made by osmosis. If you only hang with one group, you’re likely to absorb the norms of that group. So do a quick diagnosis: Whom do you associate with on a regular basis? Are they a diverse bunch with varying career goals? Do you pick the brains of those farther down the career track? Are you making assumptions about the kinds of careers you would enjoy? Have you done a self-assessment like the Clifton StrengthsFinder?

Learn to engage with people outside your field and the university setting. Compared with any other degree-holding group, Ph.D.s have the lowest rates of unemployment. But they also make up such a small percentage of the workforce that employers -- with exceptions that include scientific industries and consulting agencies -- may never encounter a Ph.D. as a prospective hire. If you are going to strike out in new directions, you’ll need to get used to interacting with people who may never have thought of hiring or collaborating with a Ph.D.

You can begin to familiarize yourself with organizations and people with whom you might like to work by regularly setting up informational interviews [5]. Depending on your schedule, you might aim for one a month. As you establish contacts outside of academe, reach out and make small “touches” with potential partners/employers throughout your time in graduate school.

Don’t only shift your attitude -- act like an entrepreneur. Allow for more career possibilities by adjusting your habits, expanding your networks and diversifying what you make.

Look up key characteristics of an entrepreneur and then cultivate a checklist of ideas that make sense for you and your discipline. Have a big-picture list, with long-term goals like:

  • Get comfortable with pitching ideas, especially outside of academe.
  • Imagine and implement a crowdsourced project.
  • Get paid to write and think in public.
  • Cultivate a donor for a project you care about.
  • Actively seek out leadership opportunities.

Once you have these larger goals down on paper, you can then look into acquiring or honing the skills that will allow you to accomplish them. Map out a schedule of activities to do each week, each month, each year. Little steps can set you up for a variety of careers after (and perhaps during) graduate school.

Adding any activities to the already overloaded schedules of graduate students may seem cruel. But you needn’t do it all at once. And though it seems counterintuitive, when you spend a little time away from the specialized training that you’re getting in your grad program, you just might help yourself stand out in the tenure-track job market. One thing is for sure: the confidence you get by succeeding in multiple arenas outside higher education will help you fend off the deepest insecurities brought on by impostor syndrome and give you a sense of the many possibilities beyond academe.

Author Bio:

James M. Van Wyck is a senior teaching fellow in the honors program at Fordham University, Lincoln Center. He is also the inaugural GSAS senior higher education administration fellow at Fordham University, Rose Hill. He is a Ph.D. student writing a dissertation on 19th-century evangelical fiction.

Indiana presidents speak out against ‘religious freedom’ law

Madeline Will, The Chronicle of Higher Education
03 April 2015 University World News Global Edition Issue 361

The Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act has stoked national controversy and outrage since Governor Mike Pence signed it into law on Thursday. Meanwhile, for university leaders in the state, it has become a public-relations nightmare.

The Indiana state government’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act has stoked national controversy and outrage since Governor Mike Pence signed it into law. Meanwhile, for university leaders in the state, it has become a public-relations nightmare.

This is an article from The Chronicle of Higher Education, America’s leading higher education publication. It is presented here under an agreement with University World News.

The ramifications of the law are unclear. Advocates say it is meant to protect religious liberty, but many others have expressed concern that the law will become a tool of discrimination — a way to allow businesses to turn away lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender customers.

Perhaps because of the lack of clarity, colleges are fielding calls from concerned prospective students and their parents. Current students and faculty members are voicing their concerns, too. University leaders have had to make a decision: Do they speak out against the law? How do they strike a balance between protecting the free exchange of ideas on their campuses and promising to be inclusive?

So far, seven institutions in the state have issued statements promising to honour their non-discrimination policies. Most, but not all, of the statements go on to condemn the law.

James M Danko, president of Butler University, became the first to weigh in. He called the law "ill conceived" and urged state leaders to "take immediate action to address the damage done by this legislation".

When the bill was passed, Danko said in an interview he did not want to get involved. But the immediate reaction to the new law, particularly from concerned prospective students, changed his plans.

"As the crescendo of noise continued to elevate," Danko said, he felt he had to speak out. "As a major employer in the city of Indianapolis, and the way that we attract people from outside the state, it was important to at least call for some common-sense approach to addressing the situation."

A few hours after his statement was released, a statement from DePauw University president, Brian W Casey, came out, although he said the timing was coincidental, while later that evening, Indiana University president, Michael A McRobbie, released a statement of his own.

"We take comfort knowing that other universities also followed suit," Danko said.

‘The tipping point’

For presidents such as Casey, the decision to speak out did not come easily. "I always think that university presidents have to be very careful speaking about current political matters," he said. "The last thing you want to do is develop official positions that stop debate on your campus. You wade into these waters only at the right time."

DePauw will soon host an event at which students can debate the merits of the law. "You want to make sure you’re providing those spaces to have those conversations," Casey said.

"We are in the business of attracting faculty and students, and if we are located in a state that does not look to be a place welcoming of all folks, that immediately hurts us [and] that’s the tipping point of the reason why you make the statement."

College presidents often shy away from taking a strong stance on social issues, let alone new laws, because they are concerned about pushback from college boards or donors, said Raymond E Crossman, president of Adler University.

Crossman, who is outspoken about many social issues, including LGBT rights, said he thought that was a mistake. In particular, higher education leaders had a responsibility to speak out on human rights issues.

"Campus communities want to see authentic leadership; I think they want their leaders to act as people," he said. "When we’re administrative robots, I think ultimately that confuses folks."

Both Danko and Casey said the reactions to their statements were mostly positive, particularly on their campuses. Students and faculty members were glad the university had said something, Casey said.

At Purdue University, the administration’s caution drew some criticism from students. The editor in chief of Purdue’s student newspaper, The Exponent, called for the president to either condemn or support the law, but to let students know where he stands.

The president is Mitchell E Daniels, a Republican who preceded Pence as Indiana’s governor. Daniels has declined to comment on the law, citing a longstanding board of trustees policy that the university was not to take part in public debates of this nature.

But then a statement from the president’s office reiterated the university’s non-discrimination policy. "We wish to take this opportunity to affirm our unwavering commitment to our principles and our opposition to any governmental measure that would interfere with their practice on our campuses," the statement said. It stopped short of explicitly condemning the new law.

`Negative ramifications’

More colleges in the state might release statements about what has become a national issue, as might colleges across the country. For instance, San Francisco State University president, Leslie E Wong, announced that no university funds would be used to pay for employee or student travel to Indiana.

"It is unconscionable for this great university to spend its resources in a state that attempts to legislate discrimination of any kind," Wong said in a written statement.

In the midst of this debate, Governor Pence, a Republican, said he would support new legislation to "clarify the intent of the law”. But that might be too little, too late, college presidents said.

"The law itself is not going to have the impact that people want to believe," Danko said. "But it’s not going to make a difference. Perception becomes reality. And we really do have to be sensitive to the negative ramifications this might have."

Pence has said he would not support a repeal of the law although the president of his alma mater, Hanover College, issued one of the strongest condemnations of the governor’s stance: Sue DeWine wrote an open letter that called the consequences of the law an affront to everything the college stood for.

"I ask that Governor Pence honour the values of his alma mater," DeWine wrote. "At Hanover College we celebrate inclusion, acceptance, and openness to all persons. We do this not only because it represents the very best of what it means to be a Hoosier, but also because it is morally the right thing to do."


University World News
http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20150403031730713

Nearly half of four-year college graduates attended two-year college